Playing Wargames

 

 

Over the years my style of Wargaming has changed dramatically, as I suspect it has with most wargamers.   I started off playing on the kitchen table, then as the armies got bigger on the floor.   Eventually I managed to get a permanent wargames table, and they ranged from 4x4 foot to 12x6 foot.  

My main love has always been Napoleonic, but I have dabbled with Ancient and WW2.   My first wargame figures were a handful of Hinton Hunt 20mm metal figures, quickly reinforced by Airfix 20mm plastic figures as they became available.   My ancient armies were Romans and Ancient Britons, which was all  that was available from Airfix.   My WW2 much wider ranging because of their comprehensive range of both figures and vehicles.

The first few years was a very steep learning curve.   There was not material available, and my main source was the series of Don Featherstone books, which I bought as soon as they were published.

My first armies were just a collection of figures, grouped in units depending on the current rules available.   Finding a copy of Henry Harris “Collecting Model Soldiers”.   From memory it had chapters on infantry, cavalry artillery and how to go about collecting models.  It was aimed at Model Soldiers, rather than Wargaming figures, but it prompted me to reorganise my collection into correct military organisations.   I didn’t have enough figures for Brigades and above, nor enough to attempt any historical orders of battles.   But it did give me a structure and organisation which at least attempted historical formations.

For many, many years my wargames were a series of figures at either end of the wargames table, who would advance and fight a large melee.   There was no attempt at historical tactics, because I did not have the facilities to do so.  This was before skirmish wargames and the rules available did not have anything like orders of battle.  

As more reference material became available, and as I gained more knowledge about Napoleonic warfare, my collection began to take shape.   The games became more historical as the rules became more complicated.   But my main inclination was always the look of things, accurate uniforms and commercial period buildings.   When Wargames Illustrated arrived with its beautiful coloured photos of games from Peter Guilders Wargames Holiday Centre I, like many more, was inspired to improve the look of the table.   A couple of visits to WHC resulted in my first wargames table with sculpted scenery, though much smaller than Peter’s tables.

The games at WHC were spectacular in their scale and detail.    Waterloo looked like a diorama, with masses of figures to represent the various armies.   He did have orders of battle for each major battle, but they were not historical.   Each corps had a number of 36 figure units, but they were not grouped in brigades or divisions.   I followed this with my own collection.

It was only when I started my 1813 campaign in 2009 that I really concentrated on creating orders of battle that would not only suit the collection of figures I had available, but also fit both the campaign map and the wargames table.   The map was designed to be transferred to the table, so each map square had a corresponding square on the wargames table.    I put a lot of work into trying to transfer current road maps into campaign maps, but eventually designed my own campaign maps, working from the table up rather than the map down.   This required a lot of compromise, but the end result has worked really well.

Each wargame table is a military district on the campaign map, and each has a city or town.   These are the strategic objectives in the campaign, and the tactical objectives on the wargames table.  

Each wargames table has nine squares, and there is a physical feature on each square.   One of those is a town or city, and that is the campaign objective.   For many years the attacker had to defeat the enemy and force them to abandon the town.   This was very difficult to achieve within the 12 moves allowed, and more often than not at the end of the game the town had not been captured.   Most often the defender would retreat to the town, forcing the attacker to advance and have to deploy again.   I would often have to make a decision based on casualties or routed brigades to decide the winner.

It was only when I decided to have game objectives that I overcame this problem.  In the photo above there are nine squares, each with a terrain piece.   The town is at the top of the photo in the centre, and the defending army deploy in these three squares.   In the centre there is a hill on the left, a woods in the centre and a hill on the left.   Nearest the camera are three more squares, and these are where the attacker deploys.

So the battle for the town is fought in the three centre squares, and the player who controls at least two of the three at the end of 12 moves is the winner.   Having three objectives makes for a much more interesting wargame.  There are three corps per side, and each objectives is allocated to each corps.   The commander in chief can create a reserve by taking brigades from any of the three corps, which allows him to support one of the three corps and gives him a big tactical advantage.  It also encourages the defender to create his own reserve to counter this likely tactic.

But most important it clearly shows who won the game.  If the defender retreats he has to abandon one of the objectives, so this type of “gamesmanship” is no longer used.   It is possible, but very unusual, for neither player to control two of the three objectives.   Sometimes each player will hold one objective, but the third is still being fought over at the end of move 12.  In those cases we allow one more move, and if that does not work the game is declared a draw.   But the player with the most casualties or routed brigades must then retreat for the sake of the campaign.

I am at a loss to explain why it took me so many years to come up with this solution.   It now seems such an obvious way to decide the winner, and it also makes for a much more interesting wargame.

Nordhausen Campaign – Day Five

6 September 1813 – Nordhausen Campaign - Day 5

French start of siege of Weringerode
4 French army – day 1 of siege of Weringerode
5 French army – defend Nordhausen
6 French army – regroup at Ebelben

Russian attack Nordhausen
1 Russian army – day 1 siege of Weringerode
2 Russian army – attack Nordhausen
3 Russian army – regroup at Heldrungen

Battle of Nordhausen – table at the end of move 2

 French army is commanded by Marshal Moncey
Russian army is commanded by General Constantine

French – 12 infantry brigades, 3 cavalry brigade, 3 corps artillery
Russian – 12 infantry brigades, 3 cavalry brigade, 3 corps artillery

French have 7 infantry, 2 cavalry and 1 artillery casualties (3,100 men)
Russians have 5 infantry casualties (2,000 men)

Both armies start the battle with casualties, 3,100 French and 2,000 Russian

There are three objectives, all in the centre of the table
The hill on the left, the hill in the centre and the walled farm on the right
The side which hold at least two objectives at the end of 12 moves win the battle

The French start the battle in and around the city of Nordhausen
The Russians enter the table at the start of move one

On the right 15th French corps occupy the walled farm
4th Russian corps cavalry rout the French cuirassier brigade
This allows the infantry to advance from the woods and attack the farm
They fail to do so and retreat back to the woods

In the Centre Moncey takes command of half of 5th corps
He deploys the cavalry, artillery and infantry between the two hills
But he is unable to advance to support the attack on either hill
The remainder of 5th Russian corps storm the right hand hill
They quickly rout the defending French infantry and secure the hill

On the left 15th Baden corps hold the hill and area to the right
6th Russian corps deploy to the left of the hill but do not attack
Three Russian infantry brigades advance onto the hill
After a prolonged melee the Baden infantry retreat

The Russians have taken two of the three game objectives and win the battle.

Comments
Both commanders take command of one cavalry and one infantry brigade and corps artillery.
They deploy opposite each other in the centre between the two hills
Neither can gain an advantage, and neither will attack, so it is a stalemate in the centre

The French garrison the walled farm on the right with their jager brigade.
Despite a determined attack the French are unable to shift them
The French hold the farm at nightfall

The attack on both hills in an infantry affair, and the result largely down to luck
Both sides start with casualties and both have brittle morale.
The Russians take both hills.

The deciding factor on the right, was the artillery commanded by Marshal Moncey.
He lost both his cavalry and infantry brigades, but the gunners held to the left of the farm
From there they could fire into the attacking Russian infantry columns, to great effect
They also routed a heavy cavalry attack

This battle had a very Russian feel to it, with hard fought infantry fighting deciding the winner

What is Wargaming

Peter Guilders Wargames Holiday Centre 1984 

A recent post on TMP prompted me to consider just what are we all trying to achieve, and what is the best way to go about it.   The question asked why do most rules have what he called “myths”.   For example on the table cavalry move about twice as fast as infantry, though in real life they can move many times more.   This type of question has been raised for many years, and is an attempt to justify Wargaming as a serious attempt to recreate real battle.      

I started Wargaming  in 1969 when I found a copy of “Charge, or how to play wargames” in the local library.   This was long before the age of the internet, so I have no idea how other wargamers felt, but I assume that like me they just accepted the rules without question.

At the same time I discovered Don Featherstone and Wargamers Newsletter.   I bought each of his books as they were published, plus any other books available in England.   I guess I was about as informed as most wargamers.   I particularly remember Don writing something along the lines of “wargames can never be the same as war – it is a game”.   This idea has had a long lasting effect on my approach to Wargaming.   Not just because Don has served in the army in WW2, but because it just seems so obviously true.

WRG rules was the first attempt to turn our playing with soldiers into recreating history.   Very complicated rules requiring pages of charts to add or subtract from a dice throw attempted to cover every situation encountered in warfare.   They overlooked the fact that as soon as you use a dice you abandon any attempt to recreate warfare.  I used them for many years, but they were long winded and created not very enjoyable wargames.

It has always seemed obvious to me that if you want to refight historical battles they best way to do it would be using a board game.   This is similar to the military Wargaming, which was used extensively to test battle plans, however not with any great success.   I served in the military and was well aware of expression “the best laid plans are discarded when the first shot is fired”.

I suspect that most of us are drawn to Wargaming by the visual spectacle of large numbers of well painted model soldiers on attractive terrain.   However that is the diorama effect, not the wargame itself.

All wargame rules must compromise with historical fact to be playable.   You have only to consider that most of us play on a table 6x6 foot or less.   Those of us who use 28mm figures are faced with the most serious compromise.   If we wish to have any space to manoeuvre we must  restrict each army to about 300 figures per side.   The obvious answer is that we would stick to skirmish style games, but most of us really want to be Napoleon or Wellington.   Attempting to fight Waterloo on a 6x6 foot table with 28mm figures in never going to end well!

Wellington v Soult on my table 2024 

It is however possible to enjoy multi corps Napoleonic wargames with 28mm figures on such a table, but you have to accept that to do so you are playing a game – not recreating Waterloo itself.   I have done so for more than 20 years, and continue to do so.   I enjoy my Wargaming, but consider it a game of chance, with a pleasing visual effect.

I suspect that those who try to justify Wargaming as a serious attempt to refight historical battles are trying to convince everyone else that they are not just playing a complicated game of toy soldiers.   If they really wanted to recreate the tactical problems encountered by Wellington and Napoleon they would do so using computer or board games.

Trying to justify wargame movement rules for cavalry and infantry movement is never going to work.

Nordhausen Campaign – Day Four

5 September 1813 – Nordhausen Campaign - Day 4

French retreat to Ebelben
4 French army – defend Weiringerode
5 French army – regroup at Nordhausen
6 French army – retreat to Heldrunger

Russian attack Weiringerode
1 Russian army – attack Weiringerode
2 Russian army – regroup at Sangerhausen
3 Russian army – occupy Heldrungen

Battle of Weiringerode – table at the end of move 2

Fourth French army is commanded by Marshal Davout
First Russian army is commanded by General Wittenstein

French – 12 infantry brigades, 3 cavalry brigade, 3 corps artillery
Russian – 12 infantry brigades, 3 cavalry brigade, 3 corps artillery

French – 6 infantry and 2 cavalry casualties (2600 men)
Russian – 6 infantry and 2 cavalry casualties (2600 men)

The battle started with the French army in and around Weiringerode
The Russian army would arrive on the table at the start of move 1
The French would be allowed to move at the start of move 1

The three game objectives were in the centre of the Table
The hill on the left, the woods in the centre and the hill on the right

On the right 10th French corps reached and occupied the hill before the Russians could arrive.
The Russian artillery were deployed to the right of the hill, supported by cavalry and artillery.]
This made it very difficult for 1st Russian corps to attack the hill.
Both sides committed three infantry brigades to the fight for the hill
The Russians won the melee, but the hill was taken by the French reserve

The centre was the best of the three for the Russians to attack
The woods itself would be an infantry melee, but the area to the right was open
11th French corps deployed their artillery and cavalry, plus one infantry brigade

Wittgenstein took command of half the infantry from 2nd corps, plus the artillery
Whilst the remainder of the infantry took the woods, he pushed the centre back
He then turned right and took the hill on the right

The left was very similar to the right, and again decided by the infantry
Once more the French won the melee, and possession of the hill
Both sides took a battering, but the French had the last reserve and won

Comments

The deployment for this battle reverted to the earlier style, with one army of table
However the defender was not in possession of the objectives at the start of the game
The layout of the table meant that the French reached the three objectives first
They took advantage to deploy their cavalry and artillery to protect the flanks of the objectives
Their artillery also dominated the open space between the objectives.
This meant that, once again, the infantry would decide the outcome.

This is the fourth game of the campaign, and the first with casualties at the start
Both sides had six infantry and two cavalry casualties, which sounds very even.
However the Russians had two cossack brigades, both C class and already inferior
So the French had a considerable advantage in cavalry.
The elite Russian infantry, grenadiers and jagers, had less casualties than the French elite

The actual brigade with casualties would dictate the whole battle for the Russian army
They had to attack, and could not afford casualties during the approach
If one brigade failed morale and routed it was quite likely they would take more with them

The Russians were able to use their artillery and cavalry to more effect, because they were mobile
The French artillery and cavalry were deployed to hold open areas, but could not react so easily
So the Russians were able to force the French artillery and cavalry to withdraw slowly
This did not win the game, but it went a long way to not losing it for the French.

It is quite difficult to explain how important just one casualty can make to the whole game.
The attacker has to put everything into the first attack, and just one bad dice can spell disaster.

I was quite surprised that this game went the full 12 moves, and the winner only decided at the end. When both armies have existing casualties just one casualty to enemy artillery fire can make all the difference. In this game both players took great care to protect their weak brigades.

I would not be surprised if some of my readers wonder how we can fight games week after week which look so similar in the photographs. Given the size of the table, and the scenery available, it goes without saying that at first glance will look similar. But the composition of the two armies, particularly at this stage, is critical And the roll of the dice even more so.

Once again an enjoyable game, which to be honest they all seem to be.

Command and Control

 

French (blue) and Russian (green) armies advance to contact

One of the most important elements of our wargame is command and control.  It has taken many years to develop the current system, and I have no doubt it will continue to develop in the future.

Each game has three objectives, situated in the centre of the table.  In this game the hill on the left, the woods in the centre and the hill on the right.   Each side has an army of three corps.   One corps per side is allocated one of those objectives.

There are four commanders per side, one commander in chief (CinC) and three corps commanders.   Each commander has a chip with either C or a (corps) number.   All of the chips are placed in a bag, and drawn one at a time.   The commander represented by the chip issues orders and goes through the move,fire, melee, morale sequence for his corps.  When all chips have been drawn, and all corps had their turn, the chips are returned to the bag and the next turn starts.

The role of the corps commander is obvious.   He must be within 12” of each brigade to issue orders, if beyond that range they can defend themselves, but not move or attack.   If he is within 4” of a brigade they get  plus 1 on morale tests.   Each square is 12”, so the corps commander is encouraged to keep his brigades close together, but also position himself within 4” of any brigade likely to have to test their morale.   It is not always possible to do both.

It took a lot of trial and error to decide how best to use the CinC.   When I wrote the rules his task was to issue orders to each corps commander, who then had to follow them to the best of their ability.   His movement rate is 16” and due to the width of the table is was pretty well impossible to change more than one or two corps orders during the game of 12 moves.

We have now refined his role to allow him to have a much more vital role.  Any brigade within 4” will add plus 1 to their morale test (but only if their corps commander is not already doing so).   The CinC can take command of any brigade within 4” and can move them from one corps area to another.   He can also create a reserve before the game starts, but must remain within 4” of each brigade as long as he wants to issue orders.

CinC supports Russian corps on the right

The CinC has created a reserve of one artillery and two infantry brigades from the corps in the centre.   He remained with that corps until they captured the woods in the centre.   He then took his reserve to the right and supported the attack on the hill.   This is a good example of the role of the CinC in our game.

Close up of attack on the hill 

The corps commander is in the centre, at the foot of the hill.   He is within 4” of the brigade still fighting on the hill, He is also within 12” of the other three infantry brigades, plus the cavalry, who have rallied and are coming forward to support the attack on the hill.   His artillery is on the right, preventing a flank attack.   He is about to lose the hill because there are three French brigades attacking his remaining one brigade.

The CinC is approaching from the left.   His artillery is in support, but cannot fire on the hill unless the French line the edge facing them.   The two infantry brigades are about to attack.   The leading one will support the melee, and the other one will support.   The CinC is within 4” of both infantry brigades and the artillery.

Our command and control provides the type of wargame we like to play.   Each commander plays an important role, but not a critical one.   The player always has to ensure that he is within 12” of all six of his brigades, or lose control of them.   He can help morale of one or more brigades by moving the commander within 4”, but only at the risk of moving out of 12” of his furthest brigade.

More important it gives a vital role to the CinC.   He can create a reserve by taking brigades from all three corps, and placing them in position to support his battle plan.   However it  must be kept in close contact with the CinC figure always within 4” of all brigades.  If not commanding a reserve he can quickly move to support a brigade in distress, or to gather a couple of brigades to support an attack or cover a retreat.

Nordhausen Campaign – Day Three

4 September 1813 – Nordhausen Campaign - Day 3

French defend Heldrungen
4 French army – regroup and resupply at Weringerode
5 French army – retreat to Nordhausen
6 French army – advance to border and defend Heldrungen

Russian attack Heldrungen
1 Russian army – regroup and resupply at Halberstadt
2 Russian army – occupy Sangerhausen
3 Russian army – Attack Heldrungen

Battle of Heldrungen – table at start of battle

Sixth French army is commanded by Marshal Poniatowski
Third Russian army is commanded by General Winzingerrode

French – 12 infantry brigades, 3 cavalry brigade, 3 corps artillery
Russian – 12 infantry brigades, 3 cavalry brigade, 3 corps artillery

All brigades are at full strength

The battle started with both armies deployed on the table, both out of artillery range
The three game objectives were in the 2 foot square between them
On the left the hill, in the centre a road junction, on the right a farm

On the right 16th French corps was delayed by having to move down from the hill
7th Russian corps arrived at the farm first, but did not immediately enter
To do so would expose the garrison to short range artillery fire
They wanted to pin the French artillery and cavalry to the right of the far
And attack the farm itself with three infantry brigades
The French heavy cavalry charged and routed the cossack brigade early in the game
Despite this the Russians took and held the farm

French deployment in the centre was delayed by having to move through Heldrungen
However the road junction was closer to them, which made up for this disadvantage
17th French corps took heavy casualties, and eventually broke and ran to the town
This allowed half of 8th Russian corps to swing right and support the attack on the farm

The attack on the hill would be decided by an infantry attack
The ground to the left of the hill would be decided by artillery and cavalry
The Russians manhandled their guns into range, and routed one infantry brigade
This forced the Polish cavalry and artillery to withdraw and allowed the infantry to attack
Both sides used their three best infantry brigades to attack the hill
Both had their elite brigade in reserve and attacked with one light and one line brigade
The Poles took the hill, greatly helped by both Russian brigades rolling a one for their morale

Having taken two of the three objectives the Russians won the battle

Comments

Both the terrain and the tactics were very similar to the last battle.
Only infantry can fight on hills, so cavalry and artillery play a secondary role
Only two brigades can fight side by side on the hills, so a third in support
This should result in a prolonged infantry skirmish and then melee.

Both players understand this basic fact, and must decide how best to use the infantry
One brigade is elite, good for melee but poor for skirmish
One brigade in light, good for skirmish but poor for melee
One brigade in average, average for both skirmish and melee
Skirmish range is 4”, which is the same distance for infantry to charge to contact

In this battle both sides held their elite brigade in reserve, but within supporting distance of 4”
This is where the chip becomes critical, to decide which side moves first.
The best tactic is to move when the other side draws first.
You move your two brigades to less than 4” from the enemy, and hope that you get first move

Today I moved first, having forced the supporting artillery and cavalry to withdraw
I moved my Russian infantry to within 3” of the Polish brigades, but the Polish chip was drawn
The Poles decided to skirmish rather than charge and melee
Their light brigade needed 4,5 or 6 to hit, the line brigade needed 5 or 6
They rolled 6 and 5, both hit causing 10% to both of my Russian brigades
My infantry both had the commander and a reserve brigade within 4”, each worth plus 1
They each had 10% casualties and were disordered, each minus 1
So they needed a roll of 4,5 or 6 to pass their test, they rolled 4 and 6, both passed

When the Russian chip was drawn they decided to attack rather than skirmish
With 10% casualties their light brigade would need 5 or 6, and the line brigade 6 to skirmish
If they charged they would get plus 1 for impact, but they had minus 1 for 10% casualties
So despite losing the skirmish fight they would still be equal in melee
They rolled a 3 and a 4, both sides had lost 10% and were disordered.

Because of my skirmish casualties I had 20% casualties and was disordered. Minus 3 for morale
The French only had 10% casualties, but was also disordered.
We both had a commander and supports within 4”, total of plus 2.
I needed a dice roll of 5 or 6 to pass morale, I rolled 2 and 4

My light brigade routed into the supporting grenadier brigade, who also routed
Jan rolled 4 and 5 and passed morale for both of her brigades

Jan lost the game, but the was still very pleased to hold the hill and rout two of my brigades

I have explained the process in some details, and I hope not too much
Because I wanted to explain that though decided by rolling 1D6, it is more than just luck
Having a commander and a formed reserve within 6” adds to morale and makes a difference
Despite taking skirmish fire first, and losing 10% casualties, I could still melee
Hopefully if unlucky (with the skirmish) I would be lucky with the melee
No so in this case, but I still won the game by taking two objectives.

Wargame Casualties

Over the years I have used many commercial rules, and without fail keeping track of casualties on the wargames table has always been a problem.   Some handled it well, some badly.   One of my favourites was Peter Guilders “In the Grand Manner” who used small curtain hooks (looking like Polo sweets) which were placed around the neck of one of the figures to represent each casualty.   It kept the clutter off the table and made it easy to move with the unit.   However, to my eye, it did spoil the look of the table, even Peter’s very large and impressive table.

In my campaign games it not only necessary to show the casualties on the table, but also to transfer them to the campaign, which is on the computer.

At the start of each campaign phase all brigades are full strength.   But after the first battle all tabletop casualties are transferred to the computer order of battle.   Most are replaced by reinforcements, but all brigades keep 10%  throughout the remainder of the campaign phase.  So the most casualties any brigade will start the wargame with is 10%

There are three army groups on each side, and each group has three armies.   Each army has three corps.   There are two orders of battle for each army, one on the computer and a hard copy to use on the table.   Above is the hard copy for 1^st Russian Army.   As part of the preparation for each wargame the hard copy is updated from the computer copy.   The figure 1 represents 10% casualties, and in this case eight corps have suffered casualties and now have 10% each.

Photo 1 above shows both armies at  the start of the game, 1^st Russian army is nearest to the camera.    You can see the casualty markers behind the brigades concerned.   1 corps (right) has two casualties, 2 corps (centre) has three  and 3 corps (Ieft) also has three.

Coloured plastic counters are used to indicate casualties.   There are four colours and samples are shown above.   The colour indicates the morale of the brigade, and the number the percentage of casualties.   Blue is fully formed, green is disordered, yellow shaken and red in rout.  Each 10% casualty is minus 1 on combat and morale tests.   Green is also minus 1, yellow and red minus 2.  There are also green, yellow and red markers without numbers.   These show the morale of the brigade even though they may not have any casualties.

The markers are quite small, but distinctive enough to be easy to see even at a distance.   When a brigade takes casualties during a game the marker is increased, but the paper order of battle is not affected.

 

This photo is a close up of 1st corps of 1^st Russian army at the end of move 8.  

1 brigade is in the centre and routing with 20% casualties, it has a red marker 2

2 brigade is still fighting on the hill, it is disordered with 20% casualties, it has green marker 2

3 brigade has routed and been rallied and is returning with 10% casualties, it has blue marker 1

4 brigade is in square supporting the artillery, it is formed with 10% casualties, it has blue marker 1

The artillery have no casualties and are formed, consequently they have no marker

Cossacks only have the 10% casualties they started with, they have a blue marker 1

You can see that even on the first photo, showing the whole table, each marker is easily recognised.   The marker is placed behind the brigade, so each player can easily spot their casualties.  They are less obvious to the other player.

We have used this casualty marker system for many years, and are still quite pleased with it.

Nordhausen Campaign – Day Two

3 September 1813 – Nordhausen Campaign - Day 2

French defend Sangerehausen
4 French army – retreat to Weringerode
5 French army – defend Sangerhausen
6 French army – defend Heldrungen

Russian attack Sangerhausen
1 Russian army – occupy Halberstadt
2 Russian army – attack Sangerhausen
3 Russian army – observe border

Battle of Sanderhausen – table at start of battle

Fifth French army is commanded by Marshal Moncey
Russian army is commanded by General Constantine

French – 12 infantry brigades, 3 cavalry brigade, 3 corps artillery
Russian – 12 infantry brigades, 3 cavalry brigade, 3 corps artillery

All brigades are at full strength

The battle started with both armies deployed on the table, both out of artillery range

The three game objectives were in the 2 foot square between them
On the left the large woods, in the centre a cottage, on the right a long hill

Both commanders decided that the key to the battle was the woods on the left
The woods covered a large area, and command and control would be difficult
Both commanders took command of half of the armies attacking the woods
Artillery and cavalry played little part in the battle, which was decided by infantry melee
Each side occupied the half of the woods nearest to them
6th Russian corps captured the northern half, and repulsed a counter attack by 16th Italian corps

The ground in the centre was open, with a small cottage being the objective
14th French corps deployed their artillery to the right of the cottage
5th Russian corps placed their artillery to the left, and attacked on this side
The French lost the cottage and the area to the left
This allowed the Russians to outflank the French position
14th French corps retreated to the town

The hill on the right was also decided by infantry
Both corps placed their cavalry and artillery to the right of the hill
The French cavalry charged the guns, who took refuge in a nearby square
The Russian cavalry were slow to react, and the French retreated without loss
Both commanders sent their best three infantry brigades to take the hill
This resulted in a prolonged melee, eventually won by the Russians.

Comments

Both armies were on the table, and within 24”, at the start of the game. This meant that the decisive fighting took place much more quickly than usual. In previous games one army had to march onto the table at the start of move 1, and would take four moves to reach the position both were in at the start of this game.

The intention of this different deployment was to allow time for the losing side to rally and launch a counter attack. And this happened to a degree, with both sides having time to rally and return routed brigades to the combat areas. But it all happened quicker than I anticipated. I don’t think this is particularly important, because the Russians were clear winners by the end of move 8. The Russians launched a counter attack on the woods on the left, and the hill on the right.

The battle for the woods was a slow business. Both sides had placed their cavalry and artillery between the woods and the road, preventing the other side outflanking the woods. Three infantry brigades attacked the woods. Both sides occupied the two sections nearest to them, but had to fight hard for the opposite two. The Russians were the first to occupy all of the woods, and they then had to fight off a French counter attack – which they did.

On the opposite flank the fight for the hill was similar. Both sides placed their artillery and cavalry to the right of the hill, and each sent three infantry brigades to fight for the hill itself. Both sides had sent their best brigades which are one elite, one light and one line. It is not obvious which is which just looking at the figures, so the combats were interesting.

The centre was completely open, very unusual in my games. Normally there is a terrain feature in each square. But I wanted to see what would happen if there was no obstacle and no cover. There was a small cottage on the table, but this was just a marker. It did not provide cover, nor was it an obstacle. I simple removed it when the Russians attacked.

This new type of deployment seems to be working well. Certainly it makes for completely different type of wargame, which is always welcome. I am sure that we will both develop new tactics for each objective with this encounter type of game. But for the present they feel fresh and a new challenge.

Getting the Balance Right

Typical game French v Prussians in north Germany

A recent comment on the blog caused me to consider getting the balance right in wargames, and also the once highly regarded subject of National Characteristics.   I remember well the many and lengthy discussions about the rights and wrongs of different national combat ability, which came under this heading.   On the surface it seems a very sensible consideration, but having played a couple of wargames it soon became obvious that it gave too great an advantage to some nations.   For example British infantry in line, British riflemen in skirmish or the French Imperial Garde in general.   On the other hand pity the wargamer who had to play a game commanding a Spanish army.  

Looking back it reminds me of the lengthy and complicated charts in Wargames Research Rules, which were my favourite Napoleonic rules for many, many years.   I shudder when I think of the many hours spent adding and subtracting for morale and combat tests.   And then the whole thing was decided by the roll of a dice.   Why did it take me so long to realise that all wargames rules are decided by the roll of a dice, and if you add to many points to one side the other will always lose.

I also remember the highly regarded muilti player large wargames, including those I was fortunate to be able to take play at Peter Gilders Wargames Holiday Centre.   The great thing about these games with large metal armies on large wargame tables was the sheer spectacle.   I remember the first time I saw Waterloo laid out on Peter Gilders terrain and was completely blown away.   I had seen similar in the pages of Wargames Illustrated, but seeing the real thing was something else.   I had two holidays at the centre, and really enjoyed the experience.   But the actual games were actually disappointing.   Much too many figures to command, much too big an area to move around but most important too many players who did not understand the rules.   I took part in a game of Leipzig when I was one of 20 players.   My opponent had never used In The Grand Manner rules before and just did what he wanted.   I had so many figures and such a large area that  I was fully occupied just trying to control my army, and by the time I realised he was pretty well ignoring the rules the game was spoiled.   But I still had to spend many more hours of heated discussion trying to explain why he could not continue to attack when all of his army should be retreating in rout.

This, and many similar wargames, finally convinced me to look at wargames from a different view point.  Instead of trying to recreate the spectacle of Waterloo or Leipzig, I would approach the rules from the player angle.   Different  players want different things from a wargame, I wanted a fun enjoyable experience for all players.  I also wanted a game which did not take weeks to plan and set up.   We spend an hour Wargaming most days, and I wanted to be able to complete a full game in about a week.   The games are a maximum of 12 moves, so if I could complete two moves in one hour I could meet my target.

If you get  the basics right, the whole thing falls into place very quickly.  

Getting back to National Characteristics.   We use French, Austrian, British (and Portuguese), Prussian, Russian and Spanish.   On the wargames table all armies have three corps.   Each corps have four infantry brigades, one cavalry brigade and corps artillery.   All are equal, except Spanish which are still a work in progress.

All artillery have the same short and maximum range.   All gunners are trained, no elite or conscript.   Thus all artillery are equal in combat and morale.

Cavalry are heavy and light, heavy get plus 1 for combat.  Most are trained, cossacks are conscript.   There are no elite.

Each corps have four infantry brigades, which have different morale, melee, firing and skirmish grades.  There are three grades, which are elite, trained and conscript.   The combination of these grades make each brigade suitable for different tasks.

First brigade is elite, they have plus one for morale and combat.   Minus 1 for skirmish.

Second brigade are light, they are trained, have minus one for volley fire and plus one for skirmish

Third brigade is standard, they are trained but no plus or minus

Fourth brigade is conscript, they have minus one for morale, combat, volley fire and skirmish

You will see that  there is very little difference between any brigades.   Imperial Garde get plus 1 and Spanish get minus 1, a total of 2 difference.   All tests are decided by rolling one D6.   So if the Garde have one casualty and roll 1 they will lose.  

None of this is perfect, but it is simple and it does give a fast moving and (for us) most often enjoyable game.   Given that we game most days that  is quite an achievement.

 

 

Nordhausen Campaign – Day One

2 September 1813 – Nordhausen Campaign - Day 1

French defend Nordhausen/Halle border
4 French army – defend Halberstadt
5 French army – defend Sangerhausen
6 French army – defend Heldrungen

Russian attack Halberstadt
1 Russian army – attack Halberstadt
2 Russian army – observe Sangerhausen
3 Russian army – observe Heldrungen

Battle of Halberstadt – table at start of battle

Both armies are deployed on the table at the start of the game, with 2 foot between them
This is a surprise attack by the Russian army.
The defending French army cannot move until the start of move 2

The three objectives are in the centre of the table.
The farm on the left, the woods in the centre and the hill on the right
The army which occupies at least two at the end of the battle is the winner

The defending army is not in position on the three objectives
Therefore the Russian army arrives at all three objectives a little earlier than the French

On the right three Russian infantry brigades are sent to take the hill
Their cavalry, artillery and one infantry brigade are deployed to the right of the hill
The French duplicate this deployment, also sending three infantry brigades to take the hill
The resulting infantry skirmish and melee decides the outcome
The French win the skirmish battle, but the Russians win the melee and occupy the hill

In the centre the Russians send three infantry brigades to take the woods.
Their cavalry, artillery and one infantry brigade hold the area between the woods and the hill
The French cavalry advance and force the Russian artillery into a nearby square
They are charged by the Russian cavalry, who win the melee and rout them
The Russian infantry hold the woods, despite a series of French counter attacks

On the left Russian infantry enter the farm, but come under fire from French artillery
The Cossack brigade are routed by the French cavalry, who in turn are routed by artillery fire
The French infantry attack the farm and after prolonged fighting rout the Russian defenders

At the end of just 6 moves both sides have suffered only light casualties
But both have a lot of brigades in rout, 11 French and 5 Russian
The French are too weak to launch another attack and the Russians win the battle

Comments
Normally the defending army are deployed on the three game objectives at the start of the game.
But for this campaign I have decided to deploy both armies at either end of the table
The three 2 foot squares containing the objectives are between them
Both armies have to advance to occupy them, resulting in an encounter style wargame

The normal sequence of a 12 move game was in three parts.
During the first four moves the attacking side moved onto the table and deployed out of range
For the next four moves the artillery and cavalry would try to gain an advantage
During the last four moves the attacking infantry would engage the defending infantry

This type of game relied on the attacker gaining an initial advantage for his cavalry or artillery.
He would then hope to break the weakened defending army with an infantry attack
Normally the first round of skirmish or melee would decide the outcome of the game
Because there would not be time to rally routed brigades and launch a counter attack
It was hoped that with this new deployment the fighting would start sooner
This would allow time for routed brigades to rally and counter attack.


This happened to a degree in this wargame, but it was not decisive
For some reason there was an unusually high number of routed brigades
And this despite the fact that casualties were not particularly high on either side
Obviously the reason was low dice at a critical time, and this applied to both sides.

In this game it happened more for morale tests than combat tests
This may be just a “one off”, and I will need to play a few more games to confirm
If so it may be necessary to change the morale rules.
This is something I have been considering for some time.

The change in deployment certainly resulted in a much more exciting wargame
Both armies were in contact at all three objectives much sooner than previously
But because of routs the expected counter attacks did not materialise.

Nordhausen Campaign Phase

Map of Europe

Our next campaign phase is set in central Germany where the Second French Army Group is opposed by the Russian Army.   This is the 23^rd campaign phase of the sixth campaign, which started in June 2020.  Nordhausen is the one with the white star.   Each star is a campaign phase and the colour indicates which side won.

There are five campaign areas and each one has a French army group plus an Austrian, British, Prussian, Russian or Spanish army.

Central Germany

There are three regions in central Germany, and the sixth campaign is fought in Erfurt region.   There are nine districts in each region, and each district is a campaign phase.   This campaign is fought in Nordhausen district.   There are nine squares in each district, each one is a wargames table.  

The French won two of the previous four campaign phases, and Russians also won two.  

Nordhausen Campaign Map

The campaign map  covers the area from Nordhausen (on the left) to Halle on the right.   The district border is the dotted purple line in the centre.   The Russian army is deployed to the right of the border, with its headquarters at Halle.   The French army is to the left, with its headquarters in Nordhausen.   The Russian army has orders to cross into Nordhausen district and take the city of Nordhausen.   It  is anticipated that they will have to fight six battles to do so, one for each town.  

Each square on this map is a 2x2 foot square on the wargames table.   There are six tables, one for each town.

Each army group is divided into three armies, and each army has three corps. 

 

Table at  start of wargame

Comment

Most campaigns last approximately 6 to 8 weeks and each wargame about seven to ten days.

I often use a campaign to test new wargame or campaign rules written as a result of the previous campaign.   For a long time our battles/wargames have consisted of one army in defence attacked by the other army.   This photo of the start of a wargame shows what I mean.   The game objectives are the centre three squares, the woods on the left, the hill in the centre and the bridge on the right.   An advance guard of one corps is in position on the hill in the centre.  The other two corps are in the squares either side of the town.   All three attacking corps are off table at the top of the photo, and will arrive at the start of move 1.

For the next  campaign we are going to test play a new deployment.   The three game objectives will be the three squares in the centre of the table.   One army will be in position on the top three squares,  the other on the bottom three.   At the start of move 1 both armies will march towards the three objectives.   This will be similar to an encounter game, where both armies march towards each other.  

There are a maximum of 12 moves in each game, and at present it is not unusual for the attacker to run out of time and the game is decided before either side has really won.  This is because it takes about four moves for the attacker to come within 12” (long range artillery fire) of the defender.   Two to four moves are required for the attacker to use his artillery and cavalry to try to gain an advantage, and then the final four moves for the attacking infantry to reach the defending infantry. 

This new deployment will allow the attacker to fight the artillery and cavalry part of the game, and to reach the enemy infantry.  In addition there should be time for a second or third round of melee to take place, which will allow for rally and counter attack.

Looking forward to seeing how well this works in practice.

Burgos Campaign – Day Seven

1 September 1813 – North Spain – Day 7

French lose campaign and retreat into Burgos district
10 French army – retreat to Picuerga
11 French army – retreat to Santa Maria
12 French army – retreat to Cuellar

British win campaign and hold Valladolid-Burgos district border
1 British army – occupy Quintana
2 British army – occupy Laguna
3 British army – occupy Coca

Burgos Campaign Map

Comments

Most of you will be aware that our campaigns, and the battles fought as a result, is very much a family affair. I do the map work on my own, and set up the table from the map with the two armies. I then brief Jan (my wife) at the table with a short background to the game and explain the winning conditions. For quite a long time this has been two of the three middle squares on the table. The player who controls at least two of those squares at the end of 12 game moves wins the game. Every square on my wargames table has a terrain feature, for example village, woods or hill. That is the object which must be controlled, rather than the whole square. Although I set up both armies on the table, Jan is free to change my deployment of her army, providing each corps remains in the square they occupy on the campaign map.

At the start of each campaign phase there is a declared objective. This is always the city which is the capitol of the military district being invaded. There is therefore always an attacking side, and a defending side. Because I run the map campaign I always command the attacking army.

The campaign map shows the area of the campaign, and the location of each corps at the start of the campaign. The British are on the left and the French on the right. There is one square between the two armies, which is no-mans-land. When a corps enters the square between them and the enemy a battle is declared. The British are the attacking force in this campaign and their objective is to take and hold the city of Burgos. They are deployed on the Valladolid side of the border with each army (of three corps) concentrated and ready to attack. The French are on the Burgos side of the border with one corps from each army on the border, and the remaining two in and around the nearest town to the border.

Normally the British would attack one army at a time. Because they are concentrated they have a slight advantage over the French. That advantage only last for the first battle, because the French react as soon as the first British army crosses the border. Because they have the advantage, it is usual for the attacking army to win at least two of the opening battles. At the end of three battles the defending army is normally in retreat towards the three towns on the right of the map, one of which is Burgos.

After the first three battles both armies have battle casualties, received during the wargame to decide the outcome of each battle. Often the losing army will have received more casualties than the attacking one Most of these casualties are replaced before the fourth battle is fought. Casualties in each brigade is reduced to 10%. This will affect both combat and morale tests for the brigade concerned, and it makes all six armies much more brittle than in the first three battles. It also makes it more difficult for the attacking player. Because he has to approach the defending army, who then normally fire first and can initiate cavalry charges. Therefore the advantage is with the attacking player in the first three battles and with the defender in the last three.

If you have followed the progress of the Burgos campaign you will be aware that things did not go smoothly. The attacking army, the British, only won one of the first three battles. Instead of advancing in pursuit of the retreating army they found themselves withdrawing back towards Valladolid. The British did win two of the next three battles, but only resulted in a draw. Because they had failed to take the French held city of Burgos they lost the campaign.

All of this does not matter much, because the whole purpose of the campaign is to produce interesting and enjoyable wargames. All six games were indeed both interesting and enjoyable. However they did highlight the weakness in requiring the attacker to force the defender to retreat after the first three battles.

The reason for the lack of British success was poor dice, made worse by particularly good dice for the French. We both feel that it is essential to accept the luck of the dice, even if it does mean a game which should last about a week only lasts a couple of days.

Burgos Campaign – Day Six

31 August 1813 – North Spain – Day 6

French attack Laguna
10 French army – regroup at Quintana
11 French army – attack Laguna
12 French army – retreat to Cuellar

British win battle of Laguna
1 British army – regroup at Palencia
2 British army – defend Laguna
3 British army – occupy Coca

Battle of Coca – Start of Battle

2nd British army retreated to Laguna having lost the battle of Santa Maria
11th French pursue and attack them at Laguna

French army is commanded by Marshal Oudinot
British army is commanded by General Hill

French – 12 infantry brigades, 3 cavalry brigade, 3 corps artillery
British – 12 infantry brigades, 3 cavalry brigade, 3 corps artillery

French have 9 infantry and 2 cavalry casualties (3800 men)
British have 6 infantry and 1 cavalry casualties (2500 men)

The game objectives are the three squares at the top of the photo
Hill on the left
Woods in the centre
Bridge on the right
The side who controls two of the three at the end of move 12 will be the winner

Both armies are deployed on the table at the start of the game

The French started the battle with more casualties than the British
To have any chance of success they would have to weaken the British cavalry or artillery
To do so they would have to attack aggressively and hope to win the opening battle
They failed miserably and had lost the battle within 4 moves out of 12.

At the end of move 4 the British held all three game objectives
They were so confident that they advanced to rout the retreating French army

Comments
In a wargame, even more than in real life, it is really difficult for the side with more casualties to win. To do so they have to fight an aggressive game, and hope to win the opening moves and inflict casualties on the enemy cavalry or artillery. With superiority in either cavalry or artillery the weak infantry can then advance and hope to win the main battle.

This game opened with the French cavalry advancing on the left flank. They were charged by the defending British cavalry, and routed with 10% casualties. The British cavalry rallied and forced the nearby gunners into an infantry square. By the end of move 2 the battle was over on the left flank.

In the centre both CinC had taken command of two cavalry brigades to form a cavalry reserve. The French cavalry now advanced and were charged by the stronger British horse. The French won the first phase, but lost the second. Both French brigades were routed with 20% and 30% casualties. The British suffered 20% to one brigade, but both rallied. By the end of move four the battle was over in the centre.

On the right flank the British occupied both ends of the bridge, with the elite light division was on the right bank. There was never any real likehood of a French victory on this flank. With the loss of their centre and left, the French retreated without a shot being fired.

When one side has such overwhelming reverses so early in the game both players have to decide whether to accept the outcome, or go back to the start positions and refight the game. Most would agree to do so, and thus avoid the sheer waste of time setting up the game. However in a campaign game this is not really an option. We both felt obliged to accept the sheer unfairness of the poor dice rolled by the French player (which was me). Even if this did mean losing a critical battle, which in turn would decide the campaign in favour of the British.

Burgos Campaign – Day Five

 

 

30 August 1813 – North Spain – Day 5

French attack Coca
10 French army – occupy Quintana
11 French army – pursue British to Laguna
12 French army – attack Coca

British win battle of Coca
1 British army – retreat to Palencia
2 British army – retreat to Laguna
3 British army – defend Coca

Battle of Coca – End of Move 2

Wellington’s invasion of Burgos District has suffered a major set back
He has lost three of the four battles fought so far
His army have been forced to abandon the invasion and retreat into Valladolid District

The French defeated Picton at the battle of Cuellar two days ago
They now attack him at Coca as he regroups and resupplies his army

12th French army is commanded by Marshal Marmont
3rd British army is commanded by General Picton

French – 12 infantry brigades, 3 cavalry brigade, 3 corps artillery
British – 12 infantry brigades, 3 cavalry brigade, 3 corps artillery

French start the battle with 8 infantry, 2 cavalry and 1 artillery casualties (3500 men)
British start the battle with 9 infantry and 3 cavalry casualties (3900 men)

Despite starting the battle with more casualties, the British win the battle.

Comments

Both armies started the battle with considerable casualties from earlier in the campaign.
This would mean that most brigades has 10% casualties and would have brittle morale
They would also be less effective in combat than those without any casualties

On the right the French infantry reached the hill without any artillery casualties
Hand to hand infantry fighting decided the outcome, which was a victory for the French

The British heavy cavalry charged and routed the French cavalry in the centre left
However they also received casualties and would both rout when a nearby brigade routed
The Polish lancers rallied and supported the attack on the town

French infantry took the hill on the left, again after extensive infantry hand to hand fighting

So the battle was decided by the Vistula Legion attack on the town
This was delayed until the cavalry melee was decided
The Polish artillery then concentrated on the right half of the town]
The garrison was routed and Polish infantry entered
However the highland brigade launched a counter attack, which routed the Poles
Meanwhile two more Polish brigades attacked the left half of the town
Heavy fighting resulted in a Polish withdrawal
At nightfall two British brigades held the town, one was shaken and the other disordered
But there were no Polish infantry left to attempt a counter attack

Normally when both sides start a game with heavy casualties there is a quick winner
One rout often leads to many more amongst the supporting brigades
Aware of this danger, the French player attacked with great caution
He managed to attack all three objectives, and all were hard fought
But the town was the deciding one, and both sides ended the game battered
If the French had just one formed infantry brigade near the town they would have won
But they didn’t.

Very enjoyable game with the winner decided at the end of move 12.