Wellington’s Army of four corps
Over the years I have collected and replaced my 20/28mm wargame figures many times since I bought my first box of Airfix in the mid 1950s. Generally the older figures were replaced with better and dearer ones, and the old collection was always sold to help pay for their replacements. There were four major manufacturers, but many more collected over the years, including a brief attempt to make my own. First were Airfix, second Hinton Hunt, third Minifigs, and fourth Front Rank.
There were also many orders of battle over the years. My first collection was what was available and what I liked the look of. It was about 1971 that I found a book in the library about collecting 54mm figures which may have been called “Collecting Model Soldiers”. It had chapters on organising armies and resulted in my first attempt to write an order of battle.
I experimented with Airfix Ancient Britons v Romans, but my real love has always been Napoleonic. I started with British and French, and gradually extended to Prussians, Russians and Austrians. Then came French allies such as Polish, Bavarian, and Italians etc. I think the last was Spanish.
For many years my wargaming was inspired by Wellington and Waterloo. As the years passed I became interested in all things Napoleonic, and started to study Napoleon’s campaigns. I knew about Wellington in the Peninsula, but not much about the Spanish battles.
By 1980 I had a collection which included all of the major nations involved in the Napoleonic Wars, and many of the minor ones. I also became more interested in the battles of the Iberian Peninsula, and with it my knowledge of the Spanish army increased – as did my collection of Spanish wargame figures.
In 1998 I began my final reorganisation. I created an order of battle which would include all of the major nations and decided to collect them in three scales. The 6mm figures would be Heroic and Ros, 18mm would be AB and 28mm Front Rank.
The order of battle for all three scales was designed to fit my 12x6 foot wargames table. There would be 8 infantry units of 36 each, 4 cavalry of 8 each and 4 guns with 4 gunners. Minor nations, such as Polish or Bavarian, would have 2 infantry and 2 cavalry plus 2 guns. Small nations, such as Italy, Westphalia, would have 1 infantry and 1 cavalry and would use French guns.
It was 2004 when I finished painting and basing the last figure, just about the time we started thinking about moving to Spain for our retirement. A permanent wargames room was always an essential part of our retirement plans. But it soon became clear that we would probably not want to run a wargames club, so a smaller table was more appropriate. We decided that we would settle on a 6x6 foot table. However our order of battle was too large for this smaller table. After much consideration I decided that the ideal number of figures for such a table was half of our current order of battle. Each nation would have 4 infantry units of 36 figures, 2 cavalry of 8 and still 4 guns. This would give us 144 infantry, 16 cavalry and 4 guns for each major nation. I considered that this would be just right for the proposed 6x6 foot table. However it did mean that I would have to sell off half of my three different scale armies. Fortunately they were all popular manufacturers, newly painted and almost unused. Also being in the UK postage was not a problem. It took just over a year to sell them all, but the last one went a few months before we moved to Spain.
We had bought our Spanish house “off plan”. This meant that we had a lot of say in the interior design of the house, and we were able to create an under build to house our wargames collection and table.
We found that our order of battle of 144 infantry, 16 cavalry and 4 guns per side fit just right on our table. Our 4 infantry units would be battalions, regiments or brigades depending on what size of wargame we wanted to fight. All worked well until I decided to create a campaign to provide us with battles to wargame. Given how comprehensive our collection was, we decided that 1813 would be the most suitable. However our order of battle was not. We wanted to play multi corps sized battles, and 4 infantry units of 36 figures did not make sense.
I was determined not to paint any more figures so I was stuck with the numbers and nationalities I already had. I wanted to be able to use all of my model soldiers, and also all of the terrain on the shelves. So I decided to have infantry brigades of 8 figures, cavalry brigades of 4 figures and corps artillery of 1 gun and 4 figures. This would give me 18 infantry brigades, 4 cavalry brigades and 4 artillery. From this I would create four corps, each of 4 infantry, 1 cavalry and 1 artillery brigades.
This left me with quite a few unwanted infantry figures. However my original infantry units included skirmish figures. So there was very few left over when I converted them to 8 figure brigades. The infantry and cavalry were already two figures to a stand, so no rebasing was necessary.
The whole reorganisation for the new order of battle took a few months, and I was using them on the wargames table long before I had completed work on my 1813 campaign. Their first appearance on our new wargames table was in June 2006, just three months after we left the UK. The photo below shows Jan taking part in that first wargame we played in Spain
Jan playing first wargame in 2006
A very interesting read and good to learn your thought process in how you organise your armies.
ReplyDeleteHi Donnie
DeleteThanks for your comment.
The advantage of writing a blog is that you can indulge in looking back on the development of your own interest in wargaming. This type of post is usually the result of a particular memory just coming out of the blue.
Thistlebarrow,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading about how your army organisation has developed over the years. I must admit that I am seriously thinking about copying your brigade & corps organisation as it would fit in very well with my Portable Wargame rules.
All the best,
Bob
Hi Bob
DeleteThanks for your comment
My brigade and corps organisation was solely due to the number and type of figures in my collection. I remember at that time that 12 figure infantry formations were all the rage, and wishing that I could use the same. However it was just not an option. I am not so used to 8 figure infantry brigades that I can't image any other size. And having them on 4 stands of two figures allows them to form line, column and square. Plus it is possible to represent a corps with just 32 infantry, 4 cavalry and 1 gun and crew.
I suspect that quite of few of us of a "certain age" would share similar memories. It was a much smaller world back then, and we were all exposed to the same influences - for example Wargamers Newsletter, Charge, or How to Play Wargames and Don Featherstone's many books.
Personally I was largely unaware of other wargamers, except through those influences. Without the internet such contacts were a monthly or yearly event. I remember the anticipation of receiving Wargamers Newsletter through the post, and poring over every page and every advert.
Happy Days
Somehow one wants to fight major battles instead of skirmishes, and even leans towards campaigns and whole wars. I like your solution: simple and elegant. It reminds me a little of the Napoleonic war games I began with - aligning with a friend's army that was organised into 4 Army Corps and the Imperial Guard., the whole amounting to 13 Divisions of 36 figures (4 regiments of 9) apiece. After some deviation into 27-figure regiments, I finally settled upon my own Army Corps system, like you, without a formal formation below Division (infantry) or Brigade (Cavalry). Big battles for small tables: just the thing!
ReplyDeleteCheers,
Ion
Hi Ion
DeleteThanks for your comments
I suspect that we all went through a long period of evolution as we abandoned the previous rules and fell in love with the newer one. This always seemed to require rebasing all of your army!
In retrospect I believe that I was always unhappy trying to convince myself that 4 infantry brigades of 36 figures could represent a corps. As I became more knowledgeable about the period I quickly realised that Napoleonic warfare was one of large formations. When wargaming the Peninsular you could fudge it because Wellington's army was organised in divisions rather than corps. But they still consisted or brigades and battalions, and the tactics required to use similar bodies of troops. And when it came to Napoleon's battles you were looking at multi corps. Having made the early mistake of buying lots of Scots Greys, RHA artillery and Old Guard infantry it was a real problem padding out the rest of the army. If you have one battalion of Guard Grenadiers represented by 36 figures, how many line infantry do you need to round up your army! I am sure you can see, and have perhaps experienced, the problem?
regards
Paul