Sunday 11 September 2022

Kufstein Campaign Day 8


28 May 1813 - Southern Germany - Day 8

Massena is determined to hold the line Oberaudorf-Kufstein-Worgl

7th army hold Oberaudorf

8th army defend Kufstein

9th army hold Worgl

 

Schwarzenberg is running short of supplies, but orders the attack on Kufstein

1st army retreat to Walchsee

2nd army attack Kufstein

3rd army hold Kitzbuhel

                       

Battle of Kufstein – Move 2

This photo is taken at the end of move two.

The Bavarian/Baden hold a very strong defensive position in front of the city of Kufstein

Half of 12th Baden corps started the game on the left bank of the river

However they have now crossed the river to join the rest of the corps

Apart from the field army, there are also two militia brigades in garrison in Kufstein

 

The Austrians have entered the table and are faced with a difficult choice.

An attack on the left will be outflanked by the Bavarian reserve on the pass

An attack on the right will have to take the strong hill

An attack in the centre will have to fight its way through the pass

All three options will be very time consuming

Schwarzenberg decided to pin the left and right and drive the centre back

He would then swing his reserve to their right to outflank the hill.

 

The photo shows the Austrian advance.

The reserve cavalry (centre) are charged by Bavarian cavalry

4th corps cavalry join the melee and rout the enemy cavalry.

 

By nightfall nine Bavarian and Baden brigades are in rout

Remainder are all shaken, including the garrison of Kufstein

The Austrians have defeated the Bavarian army, but it has taken too long

The Bavarians still hold the town, and can claim a victory

 

The French have lost 14 infantry, 5 cavalry and 2 artillery casualties (6300 men)

The Austrians have lost 9 infantry.3 cavalry and 2 artillery casualties (4100 men)

 

Comment

This game was a perfect example of a delaying battle.   The Bavarians could decide whether to hold the town itself, and engage the Austrians as they approached.   Or they could opt to try to hold the major high ground in the centre of the table.  

They decided on the latter.   The weak point is the pass in the centre.   The CinC created a reserve of two infantry and one cavalry brigades to hold this area.  But he had to hold the southern end of the pass, and he had to hold the high ground on both sides of the road.

The Austrians created a similar reserve, but could choose which side of the road to concentrate their attack.  The Bavarian cavalry tried to slow down this attack, and also did so.  However the support of 4th corps cavalry turned the tide and they were routed.

The Austrian reserve now moved right and supported 3rd corps attack on the hill.    It was now just a matter of time before 11th Bavarian corps was defeated.   Too late in the day they tried to retreat, but were surrounded and crushed.

On the opposite flank it was a more even battle between 12th Baden and 4th Austrian corps.   The Austrians eventually won, but not until very late in the day.   The outcome here was less important, providing that the Baden corps were not allowed to move to support Kufstein.

The final attack on Kufstein started on move 10, against 43 brigade in the right hand section of the city.   The Bavarian reserve of two infantry brigades had redeployed between the town and the pass.   3rd Austrian corps were the only troops available to attack, and they had already lost their artillery and cavalry.  So it was down to an infantry melee just outside the city.

The Austrians won, and two brigades attacked the town on move 12, just as night fell.   The garrison was shaken, but managed to hold (even though only poor class militia).   The attackers were also shaken, and could not launch another attack that night.  It would take too long to replace them with fresh troops, so the Bavarians remained in control of all of Kufstein at the end of the battle.   They could, and did, claim a victory.

At the end of the battle there were five Austrian infantry brigades and one battery who were not shaken or in rout.   Every single Bavarian and Baden brigade were either in rout or shaken. 

It would be pretty well impossible for the Bavarian/Baden army to hold the city for a second day of fighting.  But that had also seemed the case at Obersdorf, and they actually won the second day of battle there.

But now the Austrian army was desperately short of supplies.   All six armies had suffered heavy casualties, though not as much as the Bavarian/Baden army.   If Schwarzenberg risked a second attempt to take Kufstein, and failed, his whole army might well be destroyed.  

Overnight both commanders would study the strength returns and supply reports and decide who would blink first!

4 comments:

  1. Thistlebarrow,

    I read this account before reading the more detailed version, and I’m glad that I did as I was not totally sure why the the Bavarians had been able to claim a victory when the Austrians had done so well … but as the former still managed to hold on to the town, I can now see why. Both sides seem to have fought themselves to a virtual standstill, and I would expect them both to fall back onto their depots to rest, recover, and resupply.

    This has been an intriguing campaign to follow, and I look forward to reading about the next.

    All the best,

    Bob

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Bob

      Thanks for your comment

      The game objective was to hold the town, so the one who was in the town at the end of the game has won. But being a campaign the battle casualties, and the supply situation, are more important.

      These mini campaigns tend to follow a general trend. The first three battles are critical for the attacker. He has the advantage of the element of surprise, and can choose where to attack. But he has to force the defenders to retreat if he is to have any chance of winning the campaign.

      The second three battles are the interesting ones. If the defenders are forced to retreat they will have suffered more casualties than the attackers. But their supply situation is always easier, because they retreat towards their main depot.

      The attackers have to maintain pressure on the retreating defenders, but this comes at the cost of securing their lines of supply. They also have to move supplies forward, and stockpile them at their forward towns.

      If they continue to win they can pull it off. But they often fight day 4 and 5 with only one or two days supplies. If they lose and have to retreat they run the risk of not only running out of supplies, but also losing those stockpiled at the forward towns.

      So the outcome of the campaign is usually decided by the supply situation. Even if the attackers win they can easily run out of supplies. If they do so they must immediately retreat and will lose attrition casualties until they can resupply.

      All of this is not always obvious from the battle report, but I try to stress it on this summary and explanation of the campaign.

      regards

      Paul

      Delete
  2. This sounds like one of those 'tactical victory/ strategic defeat' situations. But it might equally well be one of those situations Carl von Clausewitz mentions in 'On War', that a victory might come at such a cost to compel a retreat. Very interesting situation.
    Cheers,
    Ion

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ion

      Thanks for your comment.

      You are quite right. The objective is to take and hold the town. But in doing so the real objective is to defeat the other army. So if the "winners" lose too many casualties during the battle, it will have a critical effect when the narrative returns to the campaign.

      If you read my reply to Bob above I hope it will explain this more clearly

      regards

      Paul

      Delete

I have set the settings for comments to come to me before posting so that I will not miss any