Some people appear to be able
to scan a new set of rules and master them with ease. I am at the opposite end of the scale. The last set of rules I bought was “Le Feu
Sacre” in 2005. Reading the rules made
no impression on me, I had to play with them four or five times before I could
understand the basics. Having mastered
them I enjoyed playing with them for about two years, before I started to find
fault with them. This has been standard
practice for me since I first bought “Charge or how to play wargames” in 1969.
I have just received a copy of
“The Portable Napoleonic Wargame” by Bob Cordery. He has named me in the acknowledgements as
having helped him to write this book.
It is extremely kind of him, and I am very grateful. He goes on to say that this blog and my 1813
campaign blog helped him. Again very
kind of him to say so.
I have never considered
myself, or my various blogs, to be of any great influence. My original intention when starting to blog
was to record my wargame interests and in particular my 1813 campaign. I wanted a permanent record of the campaign
for my own benefit. I have always kept
written notes of previous campaigns, and blogging provided a more efficient way
to do so. I also hoped that my efforts
might encourage others to get involved in wargame campaigns.
When I changed the 1813
campaign from solo to PBEM in 2009 the blog really came into its own. The campaign and wargame rules were already
online, and were now easily available to the campaign players. The campaign blog became a diary of the
campaign, with daily updates and battle reports for each of the five campaign
areas.
Bob and I share a similar
introduction to wargaming, along with many other UK wargamers of a certain age. Like me, his first wargame book was
“Charge”. Like me he was greatly
influenced by Don Featherstone. However
Bob became a leading light in Wargame Developments, whilst I continued to be
fixed on Napoleonic wargaming and the period in general. I have never belonged to WD, but have long
been aware of it in the background of the hobby. I have always considered it to be the
intellectual side of the hobby.
My first impression of his
book is that it looks very Old School.
This is a compliment, as I consider myself to be very much “Old School”. Both physically and mentally. The cover could easily have been one of Don
Featherstone’s books. There is a lot
more photographs than Don ever managed, but they are in black and white as were
most of Don’s books.
I have never used the grid
system favoured by Bob. He mentions
Joseph Morschauser’s rules, so perhaps that is more a USA rule mechanism. I see it used quite a bit in the various
blogs I follow, so it is obviously popular with some.
I am particularly impressed
that he favours small numbers of figures for his games. For anyone considering Napoleonic wargaming
the scale, size of cost involved must be very discouraging. This type of game may well encourage them to
take the plunge.
When I started blogging Bob
was not only a source of inspiration, but also very supportive with
advice. I still follow his blog and am
impressed with the wide range of subjects he covers. I am also impressed with his growing list of
published books.
If you would like further
information about “The Portable Napoleonic Wargame”, it is available from
Lulu.com
Nice to be recognised Paul, and well-deserved. Your blog is always interesting, even if I am among those who do not necessarily comment!
ReplyDelete(BTW, you may be interested to read Jeremy's comments 'Marauders Moments' about blogging, comments and stats)
Well done! My copy is in the post and I hope it arrives soon !
ReplyDeleteCheers
Hi James
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments
Thanks also for the reference to "Marauders Moments". It is one of many blogs which I check out every week or so. I had not read the post about comments, but have now done so and posted a comment myself.
regards
Paul
Hi Jacko
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment
Hope that you enjoy the rules when they arrive
regards
Paul
Thistlebarrow (Paul),
ReplyDeleteThanks very much for your write-up about my book. It was very fair and balanced, and although it is not quite your cup of tea, I thought that you brought out its better points, especially the fact that you do not need huge armies to fight interesting Napoleonic-era battles.
You mention that it is somewhat 'Old School' ... which it quite intentionally is. I sat down to write the sort of book that I would want to buy, and not one that a publisher wanted me to write! My starting point was very much 'how would Donald Featherstone et al write this?', and that has been my reference point throughout the process. My only regret is that adding colour photographs would have made it far too expensive to produce ... but as most of the 'Old School' books don't have them, it is something that I can live with.
As I wrote in my introduction, without your blog to show me what was possible, PNW would never have been written, and for that I am eternally grateful. It helped to jump-start my interest when it began to wane, and it continues to inspire me.
Many, many thanks.
All the best,
Bob
Hi Bob
ReplyDeleteI didn't realise that you had modelled your style on Don Featherstone, but I can confirm that you have achieved the "feel" you were after.
I personally prefer a low budget approach in rules. I am sure that glossy coloured photographs are popular, but they are also expensive. In the "old days" they were a rare opportunity to see the collections of people like Peter Gilder. I poured over early editions of Wargamers Illustrated for inspiration and even for uniform details. But in these days of online blogs and easy access to colour illustrations of almost any uniform of any nation, they have less appeal.
I feel that well illustrated black and white photos help to explain the rules and add a certain "serious feel" to them.
This is not to criticise the more table top type rules, simply that I prefer the more simple approach.
All the very best in your publishing work
best regards
Paul